| Principal > Daily News > News |
![]() |
|
"Creative" socialism qualifies future managers Social production businesses, an endogenous recipe
ISABEL GARCIA NEVETT Cooperatives under President Hugo Chávez' job-generation Vuelvan Caras operation have become the cornerstone of the so-called 21st century socialism. Social production companies (EPS) could also have the same fate. EPS are a new model of business organization the government has been launching from state-run oil holding Pdvsa for subsequent implementation in other economic areas nationwide. Unlike cooperatives, whose business formula was designed several decades ago in other countries, EPS are a Venezuelan native creation. They base on Chávez' promised endogenous and sovereign development. Given their novelty, EPS are hard to define clearly. Further, a number of related key details are still to be tuned up. According to Rosa Amelia González, a professor with the Institute for Advanced Studies in Management (IESA), EPS can have advantages and disadvantages. Her major question relates to the inherent obligation EPS have to invest in social projects. González ensures that imposing social obligations on
EPS can be a weakness. "If there are market advantages favoring
the creation of cooperatives or EPS, then you have to harness
such advantages, from a logical economic standpoint. But when
things are not made voluntarily, there are disadvantages.
A corporation that undertakes social projects willingly, out
of conviction, has a tendency to keep them over the time.
It is a commitment of shareholders and managers. However,
when we talk about these other forms (cooperatives and EPS),
they usually have to do with profit seekers. For instance,
amid the boom of cooperatives, only birth rates are reported,
not death rates. Rotation indices are significantly high,
as many cooperatives do not last much." Ideological framework EPS are therefore essential to create "new" men and women within the framework of socialism for the next millennium. Likewise, through EPS the government intends to control exaggerated
consumption and desire of lucre. Based on the premise that
"being rich is wrong," the document questions the citizens'
basic needs. "We cannot fall into the trap of boosting extreme
consumption, luxury and exaggeration. Is the subway or the
bus enough to meet the transportation needs of an individual
who lives in Guarenas (in the outskirts of Caracas) and works
in Plaza Sucre (west Caracas)? Or are we all going to own
a car? Are we all going to claim two cars to see our basic,
essential needs met? Minimum wage is VEB 405,000 (USD 108.88),
and many earn less than that. Should not there be standards
for basic, essential needs?" "I find it more accurate, as a State, to say that you are facing social problems and a growing poverty rate, and that you need businesses intended to solve employment, social or infrastructure problems. But such companies have to preserve the business sense and generate both wealth and jobs," Paez claims. He adds that creating new social control mechanisms is not the right way to eradicate poverty and social problems in Venezuela. Meanwhile, Eduardo Gómez Sigala, president of the Venezuelan
Confederation of Industries (Conindustria), while reluctant
to talk about EPS, warned that EPS and co-management are the
beneficiaries of the official policy of raw materials supply,
but for Conindustria "this is not an industrial policy sufficient
to outline growth strategies for the future." Translated by Maryflor Suárez R. |
| Privacy policy | Legal Terms | Terms of use |
|
| Copyright @ Diario El Universal C.A. 2005 |
|
|