Hemispheric polarization
|
|
'
) {
document.getElementById("addsHeader").style.display = '';
}
-->
|
| |
ALBERTO GARRIDO
EL UNIVERSAL
While the polarization between US President George W. Bush
and his Venezuelan counterpart Hugo Chávez has not burst
yet, it has escalated. The block composed of Chávez,
Cuban ruler Fidel Castro and Bolivian President Evo Morales
resolved to bolster, by means of energy pressure, the revolutionary
socialist triangle. Their space, so far, is the Americas,
with no national exceptions. Polarization prompted by Cuba,
Venezuelan and Bolivia considered as completed the stage of
Inter-American institutional transition, because it is not
in line with their strategic interests, the goal of which
is the establishment of socialism in the hemisphere.
The Andean Community of Nations (CAN) is not needed anymore
because is useful for the United States on its way to the
Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), via Free Trade Agreements
(FTA's). The Group of Three (G3), including Colombia, Mexico
and Venezuela, is also superfluous, because Mexico and Colombia
entered into agreements with the United States.
Uruguay, disappointed with "this" Mercosur of Brazil and
Argentina, is getting ready to execute a FTA with Washington.
Ecuador is sorely tempted to sign it. These and other countries
on similar conditions got a message. Even Brazil and Argentina,
that tried to use Chávez and the Venezuelan oil to "soften"
Washington during the discussions towards a light FTAA, i.e.,
to make them solve trade differences between the United States
and both nations, have to choose between their national interests
and their energy future.
Chávez radical behavior goes beyond the electoral-international
or domestic areas, including a referendum to remain in power
until 2031. Peruvian candidate for president Ollanta Humala
failed to understand it. Lula and Kirchner did not get it
either. Chávez is a major polarizing factor in the hemisphere.
It is the turn of states. However, the turn of peoples, represented
by parties or movements, is coming. Never mind that they have
petro-states as a strategic weapon.
Nevertheless, the agreement executed in Havana is the Free
Peoples' Agreement. This is why Chávez talks about replacing
the term of "integration" with "union," closer to the Bolivarian
idea of great homeland. It is just that this union should
take place in the ultimate context of a socialist Latin America
and the Caribbean. Such a strategy carries several stages,
particularly the resistance, or asymmetric, war against the
United States.
The White House does not fully understand what it is facing.
In the meantime, it continues developing the assumption of
"multiple wars" in the context of global confrontation. This
helps to explain why director Porter Gross quit the CIA leadership.
Gross paved the way for Michael Hayden, a general of the team
of John Negroponte, one of the most renowned hawks under the
administrations of Ronald Reagan and Bush II.
The Pentagon controls already almost 80 percent of US spying
and intelligence budgets.
For his part, according to The Washington Post, Donald Rumsfeld
gave the green light to the establishment of Special Forces
in Latin America "with absolute freedom to act." Thus, the
Pentagon will not need to ask for clearance of the US embassies
in those countries where they will be deployed.
He, who has eyes, should use common sense.
Translated by Conchita
Delgado
|