| Principal > Daily News > News | ||||||
![]() | ||||||
| | |
|
| | ||||
|
Government to implement move against 53-year-old RCTV
January 2nd In a press release, Álvarez stressed: "RCTV is a media that started operations over 50 years ago and has kept an editorial stance predominantly critical of the current government." In the document, Álvarez states that "in May 1987, the Venezuelan Government renewed the broadcasting license (to RCTV) for 20 years. The present government claims that such a license is therefore expiring in May 2007. However, RCTV argues that the broadcasting license was renewed in 2001 and is effective up to 2012." Álvarez, a Venezuelan national, added that "beyond any
legal considerations, the Office of the Special Rapporteur
for Freedom of Speech believes that, in the event that such
government move takes effect, Venezuelans would be deprived
from the possibility to have access to a media with an editorial
stance opposed to the government." Monsignor Urosa Savino said he respected the Venezuelan Government move, but recommended "making efforts to reach an understanding, because the country wins if there is both diverse media and full freedom of opinion." He added that all citizens are entitled to have access to the information and that information must be "diverse," because listening to one single point of view is not democratic. "This decision -which has not been enforced yet- need to
be reconsidered so that Radio Caracas Televisión, a long-standing
and important TV channel, continues to exist." In a press release, Lara added that the fact that Cardinal Jorge Urosa Savino expressed respect for Chávez' decision is "a positive signal of serene abidance by the laws and lawfulness of the Executive Branch's move." Lara's remarks came following Caracas Archbishop Urosa Savino's remarks asking the government to reconsider Chávez' decision. Lara added that Urosa Savino had no reasons to be concerned
about the plurality of the media in Venezuela. "The increased
number of radio stations, TV networks, newspapers, magazines,
websites and their diverse political trends is the most reliable
guarantee that Venezuelans will continue to have plural information
on a daily basis, within the framework of the dynamics of
freedom of speech and information that is characteristic in
Venezuelan democracy." Hindu Anderi, coordinator of FIPP, said they are to start working sessions to discuss the initiative as of January 27th. "Our goal is to let the people discuss the diverse proposals made regarding the use of this TV signal." Anderi added that last December they started collecting signatures nationwide to support President Hugo Chávez' decision not to renew the broadcasting license to RCTV, which expires next May. She added that they are also to discuss the contents that should be broadcast on the media, particularly the television. "The time has come to talk about the television we want to
watch and insist on television as a public service. This is
the time for a comprehensive revision of the programs broadcast
on all Venezuelan TV networks, most of which are not making
contributions to educate our republicans." "Beyond any legal considerations, the Office of the Special
Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression feels that, should the
government decision be enforced, Venezuelans will have no
possibility to access a broadcaster with an editorial stance
different from the Government," the agency said in an official
press release. The action is related to a complaint filed against the Venezuelan
state for violation of freedom of expression, personal integrity,
judicial rights, due process and judicial protection, under
the American Convention on Human Rights. IAHCR found that the charges, including previous attacks by government supporters, could be attributed to the State. The Inter-American Court, at the request of IACHR, noted that the State should ensure proper working and operation conditions. "The mass media help to materialize freedom of expression. Therefore, operation conditions should fit into the requirements of such freedom." January 5th In a ruling disclosed on January 4th, the body of the Organization of American States (OAS) also set a two-month period for the Venezuelan Government to meet the requirements. Otherwise, the case would be taken to the Inter-American Court, a tribunal with the capacity to sentence the Venezuelan State to pay damages and implement changes to domestic legislations. The case dates back to 2002, when RCTV filed with the IACHR a complaint against the Venezuelan State for violation of freedom of expression, personal integrity, judicial rights, due process and judicial protection, under the American Convention on Human Rights, for the "diverse and systematic personal and moral aggressions, threats and serious attacks" against RCTV staff. Back in 2002, the IACHR, and the Inter-American Court, asked Venezuelan authorities to protect the lives of reporters Luisiana Ríos and Laura Castellanos and technicians Armando Amaya, Antonio José Monroy and Argenis Uribe, who came under attack of pro-government groups while making their jobs. RCTV asked an investigation to be launched and to make the attackers be in the defendants' dock. They also asked the government to reject any attacks against media workers, as they "help realize the exercise of freedom of expression." RCTV shows satisfaction Last, the TV network reminded that "human right violation
crimes do not have a statute of limitations and any official
perpetrating such crimes will be held criminal, civil, patrimonial
and administratively responsible, regardless of the fact that
they may have been meeting orders from their superiors." "A comprehensive revision of these media -beyond TV channels- is necessary too because some radio stations and newspapers need to be reviewed too." Some 10 newspapers and five TV channels, together with a
number of radio stations, are currently operating in Bolívar
state -the region with the highest number of media per capita
in Venezuela. The action could be regarded as "censorship of freedom of expression," said the senior official in a communiqué. Following the recent announcement of President Hugo Chávez, the secretary-general urged the Government to review its decision and noted that the availability of multiple media is what allows for different views. Besides any legal considerations, Insulza thinks that the political impact of the move should be taken into account. "Closing a mass medium is an uncommon event in the history
of our hemisphere; an unprecedented event over the last few
decades under democracy," he noted. "This is intended to silence dissenting sectors (…) It could be the beginning of a big strike against the Venezuelan democratic system and bumps into the Venezuelan democracy." The opposition leader labeled the move as "disrespect" and a violation both of the Venezuelan Constitution and the Pact of San Jose. |
| | |
|
| | ||||
| Privacy policy | Legal Terms | Terms of use |
|
| Copyright @ Diario El Universal C.A. 2006 |
|
|