CARACAS, Thursday September 11, 2008 | Update
The US drug czar views law enforcement cooperation without actual presence in the other country as a very awkward sort of cooperation (Photo: AFP)
Politics
John Walters is the Director of National Drug Control Policy
(ONDCP). As the US drug czar, he coordinates all aspects of
Federal drug control programs and spending. Disappointed for
his failure to meet with Venezuelan authorities, the official
warned against increasing drug traffic in Venezuela.
What steps have you taken to meet with President Chávez
or any Venezuelan anti-drug authority?
We have tried to make contact with Venezuelan officials for
years to restart anti-drug cooperation. When the Venezuelan
President and his foreign minister made public comments recently
stating that they want to cooperate on drugs, we took that
as a positive sign and sought to follow up. Unfortunately,
the Venezuelan government has not granted us meetings and/or
approved our visa requests to travel to meet with either the
President or any other appropriate official.
It is unfortunate that Venezuelan officials are not interested
in meeting with us. I have critical documents that we
have wanted to give Venezuelan officials that show the explosion
in drug trafficking taking place through that nation and a
list of things the Venezuelan government can do to cooperate.
It is important to remember that in the end, this is not
about meetings. This is about steps we can take cooperatively
now to stop drug trafficking Venezuela has an air force, it
has radar and it has a trained military. These forces
can stop contraband air flights now, and that is what they
need to do. We do not need to have a meeting for that to take
place.
If you could meet with any Venezuelan anti-drug authority
or President Chávez, what would you tell them?
I would explain how drugs are a menace to all civilized societies.
They engender violence, corruption and sap the spirit of our
youth. They are a recognized world-wide problem that
has warranted a separate U.N. office and U.N. mandates to
coordinate international efforts against them. No country
or political system is immune from this threat; that is why
they all cooperate in attacking this scourge. Polls
of the Venezuelan public show that crime and insecurity are
their number one concern, and there is no doubt the drug trafficking
contributes to the damage being done to Venezuelan society.
The President of Venezuela alleges that the United States
is playing politics with the drug issue. We are not.
If he wants to do something concrete to get a grip on the
threat, here are some suggestions that are easy to measure
and would be immediately visible. First: We would like to
see the Venezuelan President direct the leadership of his
government - in writing - to facilitate cooperation with the
U.S and approve the pending visa applications of DEA agents.
Second: The FARC are the world's leading cocaine-producing
organization. The Venezuelan government should announce
that the FARC are not welcome in Venezuela and call for the
arrest and deportation of all FARC in Venezuela. Third: The
Government of Venezuela should re-establish vetted anti-drug
units that can work with DEA. Fourth: Venezuela should re-orient
the Venezuelan Superintendent of Banks' Financial Intelligence
Unit and facilitate financial information sharing. Fifth:
Venezuela should reestablish a military anti-drug liaison
officer on assignment to the United States at the Joint Interagency
Task Force of the Southern Command, with the ability to direct
cooperation with units inside of Venezuela. Finally: The Venezuelans
should put to use a U.S.-funded cargo inspection center that
has sat - unused - in Puerto Cabello (Venezuela's largest
port) for the physical inspection of suspicious cargo.
Chávez looks mistrustful due to the prior experience
with DEA in Venezuela. He claims that some agents were spying
and some were not accountable to Venezuelan authorities. In
addition, he says that even in the absence of the US cooperation
the number of drug seizures has grown. What is your opinion?
First of all, they have decreased since the end of bilateral
counternarcotics cooperation. Venezuela's own
National Antinarcotics Office (ONA) indicates that 2005 was
the peak year of cocaine seizures in Venezuela with 58.435
metric tons. Since then, despite what we believe is
an enormous increase in the amount of cocaine passing through,
seizures have dropped steadily: 38.938 metric tons in 2006
and 31.79 metric tons in 2007.
As to being trustworthy, it is remarkable to me that in the
62 countries worldwide where DEA cooperates with national
law enforcement, only in Venezuela has the President decided
that DEA agents were spying. The DEA does not engage in any
activity but counternarcotics.
I would also tell the President on the issue of trust, that
he ought to put in place some strong measures to remove temptation
from his own law enforcement authorities. We believe,
on good evidence, that the quantity of drugs transiting Venezuela
is up 500% since 2002. Yet in the last three years seizures
have fallen. I don't believe that the police and military
have become less efficient or that the criminals have gotten
any smarter, but I fear that some in positions of authority
may have become corrupt. Seized drugs that are re-sold
to criminals are just as valuable as smuggled drugs.
So why put temptation in front of the police and the military?
Currently, the Venezuelan government forbids us from observing
the destruction of seized narcotics. So we have no idea
if they are really destroyed. The President of Venezuela
could easily allow international monitors to take random samples
of seized narcotics, and witness the destruction of seized
loads. If he does not trust the DEA, another internationally
respected organization could perform the function. It
would offer the credibility that honest law enforcement and
police officers deserve.
Do you think that Venezuela and the United States could
reach an agreement whereby the Venezuelan authorities' sovereignty
could be observed, without the need to deploy US agents in
Venezuelan territory?
A country's sovereignty is always observed by DEA - just
ask any of the other 62 countries in the world in which they
operate. I can't imagine that Great Britain or Italy
would agree to let DEA operate inside their country if they
were set on violating their sovereignty. Secondly, there
are numerous diplomatic instruments available to countries
that want to work with each other that could be crafted, such
as, a Memorandum of Understanding, or a Letter of Agreement.
Law enforcement cooperation without actual presence in the
other country is a very awkward sort of cooperation.
I'm not sure that it would add a great deal to the ability
of either country to disrupt rich and powerful drug trafficking
organizations or to expose the people who assist them.
What is the status of illicit drug traffic in Venezuela?
According to the Venezuelan government, there has been a significant
increase of seizures, which apparently shows that anti-drug
efforts are yielding better results.
Cocaine flow through Venezuela is exploding. It has
grown from 57 metric tons in 2004 to 255 metric tons in 2007.
Seizures peaked in 2005 and have been dropping, even when
seizures of marijuana, which probably don't go to global markets,
are included to pump up the figures.
What, in your view, are the reasons for the increasing
drug traffic through Venezuela?
There are three principle reasons. First, Venezuela's
support of the FARC encouraged them to traffic cocaine through
Venezuela and develop routes and methods to facilitate the
trade. This is especially true now that Colombia is
putting even more pressure on the FARC and greatly complicating
their production, distribution, and transportation system
out of the country. Venezuela has become the path of
least resistance. Now that President Chavez has advised
the FARC to lay down their arms, that relationship may have
changed.
Second, cocaine moving through Venezuela is attracting the
attention of international, and very wealthy, drug trafficking
organizations. Their money and an atmosphere of tolerance
for the FARC, is leading to institutional corruption and the
shipment of ever larger amounts through Venezuela.
Finally, the Venezuelan government's denial and lack of will
to take tough, even unpleasant actions against drugs and corruption
is making the problem larger. The President of Venezuela
may be unable to conceive of the drug threat in any but political
terms or as part of a vast conspiracy underwritten by the
United States. He refuses to cooperate with us,
but he also refuses to take serious counter-drug action on
his own. That refusal is to the great detriment of Venezuela's
international reputation and at high cost to the Venezuelan
people.
Dou you know of any signs of corruption among the officials
involved in anti-drug efforts in Venezuela? Is that a reason
for the growing drug traffic?
Unfortunately, we have seen signs of corruption. You
are probably aware of several officials who have been denied
visas to the U.S. in the past. That has been as a result
of their ties to drug trafficking and other corrupt activities.
When traffickers find a weak link in the system they can
exploit they do - Venezuela is gaining the reputation among
traffickers of being "for sale" and, thus, the preferred destination
for traffickers because of the corruption and the impunity
that is rampant as other countries in the region crack down
on them.
Are there any signs of rising drug production in Venezuela?
It is hard to say because of the lack of cooperation since
2005. Nevertheless, it stands to reason that as Colombia
aggressively attacks the drug industry inside its borders
that those operations could easily move to more hospitable
areas, such as Venezuela.
Translated by Conchita Delgado
Reyes Theis
EL UNIVERSAL
01:11 PM.
Economy.
Domestic inflation rate in Venezuela was 1.7 percent in January, at the same rate as in December 2009, despite currency devaluation at the start of the year decreed by President Hugo Chávez, a senior government source told Reuters on Tuesday.