Venezuela's price control leaves no room for profits
Controls may bring regulated commodities supply down
The model the Venezuelan Executive Office used to regulate the price of basic commodities leaves behind the negotiations held with actors of the production and commercialization chain. It also seeks to set a ceiling to profits arising from the sales of those products in each of the links of the chain.
According to Food Minister Carlos Osorio, most essential basic commodities will be imposed a 3-5% profit margin.
Analysts from the food sector reckon that the aforesaid model –adopted by the National Superintendence of Fair Costs and Prices (Sundecop) a year ago- does not include the products' commercial dynamism. Such products are suffering a wide accumulated price gap.
"This is an attack against the market's competition and against economic freedom in general. Today producer prices are negative in products such as precooked flour and rice despite the recent adjustment. The methodology they have been implementing is confusing. Many producers trade their own products," an analyst said.
By keeping control throughout the commercialization chain, the industries and stores will further depend on the Government to set prices and profit margins.
It is also believed that time will tell what the impact of regulations on supply will be. This will depend on the steps taken on those commodities, "yet the control is on profits, which leads to distortions. If profits are below production costs, it will bring about distortion in businesses; only those products yielding more profits will be sold."
Translated by Jhean Cabrera
Pablo Jiménez Guaricuco was summarily dismissed from his Clerk III job at the Autonomous Service of Public Registries and Notaries' Offices (Saren). He read a notice published in a newspaper on November 5 informing the public that he was no longer employed to the Saren. He was sacked despite the fact that he was taking a leave of absence from work due to a work-related accident, and that he enjoyed security of employment under the parental job-immunity privilege. Most probably, the decision was influenced by his role as a union organizer. But what did he do, besides leading protests, to deserve the sack? Well, he allegedly sent off a series of tweets that definitely hurt the sensitivity of the Saren Directorate.