Capriles: Court decision solves nothing but a problem in Chávez's party
For Henrique Capriles Radonski, the ruling of the Supreme Tribunal of Justice to support the "administrative continuity" of President Hugo Chávez's Government "fails to dispell uncertainty" in Venezuela
- Opposition legislators rebut top court decision on Chávez's swearing-in
- Cabello: The people will be sworn in as president as Chávez is the people
- Ecuador's Correa: The revolutionary process in our America must continue
- Insulza: Controversy surrounds the issue of Chávez's inauguration
- Former Paraguayan president to attend rally in support of Chávez
- Top court decides that President Chávez does not need to take oath again
"Enough of threats and hatred! Venezuelans are tired of intimidation," he said during a press conference.
Capriles added that the opposition "does not seek confrontation or fights between one sector and the other." "Make no mistake about this. We in the opposition are determined to engage in dialogue, while you are playing games with the situation facing Venezuela," Capriles warned the leaders of President Hugo Chávez's party.
"We (dissenters) are not going to ask one sector to hit the streets to confront the other sector. I want to make clear that this is not a sign of weakness. We have built a path leading to a better country," he reiterated.
According to Capriles, the ruling issued on Wednesday by the Supreme Tribunal of Justice (TSJ) endorsing the thesis of "administrative continuity" of Chávez's Government and determining that Chávez does not need to take oath again for his new presidential term "fails to dispell uncertainty" in Venezuela.
"The Justices of the Constitutional Court, TSJ, made a decision to solve a problem facing the ruling party," he said.
He said the Venezuelan Government has come to a halt, and warned the National Assembly, "you have no more excuses for not solving the problems of Venezuelans."
Capriles also referred to the events to be staged by the PSUV on January 10 and said that not all Latin American presidents would attend such political acts.
"They (the Executive Office) made all the arrangements and begged for them to take part in a political act because they do not want to discuss the problem facing Venezuelans," he said.
José Vicente Rangel clearly said: "We are not conducting negotiations threatened with a gun in the head." He warned behind closed doors in the midst of the social upheaval occurred during the oil strike in 2002 and 2003. Dissenting Timoteo Zambrano answered back that no other option was available: "The thing is that otherwise, you do not negotiate."