OAS is closely monitoring political developments in Venezuela
Venezuelan Ambassador to the Organization of American States (OAS) said that Venezuela's opposition coalition may not participate in a meeting of the body's Permanent Council
On Monday, Zela received a letter from the MUD, which reported on the irregular political situation facing Venezuela. In his reply, Zela guaranteed that the Inter-American Democratic Charter is the base of any assessments made by the body. Further, he remarked that the OAS remains permanently available to listen to the claims of the Venezuelan opposition coalition.
In the letter addressed to Insulza, the MUD urged the OAS "to convene promptly a meeting at the OAS Permanent Council" and asked to take the floor at the council to provide information that may help Member States to be fully aware of the situation of the country.
OAS's Secretary General José Miguel Insulza said last week that the organization fully respects the decisions made by the Venezuelan constitutional branches of Government concerning the inauguration of Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez's.
He added that "if a country is willing to address this or any other issue at the OAS, it may be done at the Permanent Council." Insulza pointed out that the OAS participates whenever there is an institutional crisis among the branches of Government, yet this is not the case.
For his part, Venezuela's Ambassador to the OAS Roy Chaderton noted that the OAS comprises States only, and therefore, the opposition's move to convene a meeting with the Permanent Council is unrealistic.
Translated by Jhean Cabrera
Pablo Jiménez Guaricuco was summarily dismissed from his Clerk III job at the Autonomous Service of Public Registries and Notaries' Offices (Saren). He read a notice published in a newspaper on November 5 informing the public that he was no longer employed to the Saren. He was sacked despite the fact that he was taking a leave of absence from work due to a work-related accident, and that he enjoyed security of employment under the parental job-immunity privilege. Most probably, the decision was influenced by his role as a union organizer. But what did he do, besides leading protests, to deserve the sack? Well, he allegedly sent off a series of tweets that definitely hurt the sensitivity of the Saren Directorate.