OPINION
Bottom-Up
Venezuela is one of the most unequal nations on earth: as USD 1 trillion passed through the hands of the state since 1999, top political leaders wound up with far more wealth than many millions of families on the bottom, who are still relatively poor
MICHAEL ROWAN
| EL UNIVERSAL
Wednesday January 09, 2013 09:30 AM
Venezuela's failure has been caused by top-down consumer spending while the world has been succeeding with bottom-up consumer investment. Top-down command economies, which are typical in oil states, historically generate low productivity, high inflation and rampant corruption. Incentives for crony capitalism, theft and political handouts drive the society toward deals and away from work. Dependence on state monopolies discourages entrepreneurship and investment.
Venezuela was spinning in this tornado of self-defeatism for a long time before Chavez perfected the spin and called it a revolution. The policy victims are the bottom half of the economic pyramid, people who are confused by getting bigger handouts for consumption each year but which make them poorer through inflation.
The question facing Venezuela is whether to continue down the path of failure or to strike a new path toward prosperity. The choice sounds simple but is not because the power elites profit enormously from top-down waste, corruption and inequality. Venezuela is one of the most unequal nations on earth: as USD 1 trillion passed through the hands of the state since 1999, top political leaders wound up with far more wealth than many millions of families on the bottom, who are still relatively poor.
In 2006, I showed in "Getting Over Chavez and Poverty" that the bottom Venezuelan families could work themselves into the middle classes through a capital investment of USD 48 billion in money-making equipment, small businesses, housing mortgages, and education. The key to bottom-up wealth is having private families own the credit, equipment, business, housing and education –not the state. Families need the independent work of making investments pay off for their children. As a result, they become self-reliant, middle-class, independent actors that the state cannot push around at will. This is what happened in Alaska, Norway and now Brazil, which sowed their oil in the bottom of the society in order to set them free. Why this commonplace and common sense solution has never been tried in Venezuela remains a mystery.
michaelrowan22@gmail.com
Venezuela was spinning in this tornado of self-defeatism for a long time before Chavez perfected the spin and called it a revolution. The policy victims are the bottom half of the economic pyramid, people who are confused by getting bigger handouts for consumption each year but which make them poorer through inflation.
The question facing Venezuela is whether to continue down the path of failure or to strike a new path toward prosperity. The choice sounds simple but is not because the power elites profit enormously from top-down waste, corruption and inequality. Venezuela is one of the most unequal nations on earth: as USD 1 trillion passed through the hands of the state since 1999, top political leaders wound up with far more wealth than many millions of families on the bottom, who are still relatively poor.
In 2006, I showed in "Getting Over Chavez and Poverty" that the bottom Venezuelan families could work themselves into the middle classes through a capital investment of USD 48 billion in money-making equipment, small businesses, housing mortgages, and education. The key to bottom-up wealth is having private families own the credit, equipment, business, housing and education –not the state. Families need the independent work of making investments pay off for their children. As a result, they become self-reliant, middle-class, independent actors that the state cannot push around at will. This is what happened in Alaska, Norway and now Brazil, which sowed their oil in the bottom of the society in order to set them free. Why this commonplace and common sense solution has never been tried in Venezuela remains a mystery.
michaelrowan22@gmail.com
ADVERTISING SPACE
Dossier
The dialogue experience
José Vicente Rangel clearly said: "We are not conducting negotiations threatened with a gun in the head." He warned behind closed doors in the midst of the social upheaval occurred during the oil strike in 2002 and 2003. Dissenting Timoteo Zambrano answered back that no other option was available: "The thing is that otherwise, you do not negotiate."
Ranking
- Read
Alianzas
Cómo anunciar |
Suscripciones |
Contáctenos |
Política de privacidad
Términos legales |
Condiciones de uso |
Mapa del Sitio |
Ayuda
El Universal - Todos los derechos reservados 2013